<img height="1" width="1" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=3990718177617800&amp;ev=PageView &amp;noscript=1">

The Hole Watch: A Confined Space Quarterback

Thursday, August 22, 2024

shutterstock_2052947417

When out in the field for a rescue stand-by job, one of the first things we do is track down the Confined Space Attendant (Hole Watch). At Roco, we've made it a priority to strike up a conversation with the attendant to establish rapport and ensure they understand the work being done, their knowledge of confined space operations, and their role on the “team.” In the confined space world, think of the attendant as the “quarterback” of a football team. Just like a quarterback, the attendant is the pivotal position in executing the entry supervisor’s game plan; which, in this case, is the safe and successful completion of the confined space entry.

Unfortunately, the “hole watch” is too often the low person on the totem pole or the greenest hand on site. Imagine you’re putting together a football team and deciding that the quarterback position is where you’re going to hide your least experienced player. You’ll lose more games than you win, I promise. This is exactly what happens at job sites all over the country every day. Workers get hurt and sometimes killed due to the lack of knowledge and experience in the attendant role.


"Workers get hurt and sometimes killed due to the lack of knowledge and experience in the attendant role."


Much like a quarterback receives a game plan from the head coach, the attendant takes their direction from the entry supervisor. It’s their job to understand the “plays”—the roles and responsibilities laid out by OSHA’s Confined Space Regulation (29 CFR 1910.146)—and to ensure that every part of the operation runs smoothly. The attendant isn’t just a passive player; they’re actively observing the situation, similar to when a quarterback reads the defense on the field.

Take, for example, atmospheric monitoring. Does an untrained person intuitively understand the risks of striated atmospheres? Would they understand how and when to calibrate or bump a monitor? Do they know how to avoid short circuiting or recirculating when using ventilation? They surely couldn’t navigate troubleshooting these situations without proper training. I’ve witnessed firsthand situations where a ventilation fan was placed too close to a bank of gas-powered welding machines, causing carbon monoxide levels inside the space to skyrocket. These normally “untold” stories are far too common and most certainly avoidable – most of us in the standby field have seen this type of misstep repeatedly.

shutterstock_1487104451When a quarterback steps up to the line of scrimmage and sees that the defense is set to shut down the play, they call an audible, or change the play. This quick switch could be the difference between a successful drive and a disastrous turnover. In the same way, a well-trained attendant has to be ready to make critical decisions on the spot. If the conditions inside or outside the space change, or if a hazard suddenly arises, the attendant must “call an audible” by ordering an evacuation and consulting the entry supervisor for an adjusted game plan. The confidence and training to pull off this maneuver has saved lives time and time again.

There was a situation about ten years ago where a skilled attendant was overseeing an entry into an underground vault where the entrants were installing a new valve. The attendant had been involved in shutting down and isolating the space, much like a quarterback, who’s been studying the defense all week. When it came time to re-pressurize the line, the attendant made a crucial call. He ordered the entrants to exit the space while the pipe was brought up to pressure, despite their protests that they needed to stay in to handle any potential leaks. It was the equivalent of calling an audible. The line ruptured, and the vault filled with water in a matter of seconds. The attendant’s decision saved lives—just like a quarterback’s quick thinking can turn a losing play into a game-winning moment.


"The attendant’s decision saved lives—just like a quarterback’s quick thinking can turn a losing play into a game-winning moment."


In both football and confined space operations, success hinges on the ability to execute a plan, adapt to changing conditions, and communicate effectively. The confined space attendant, like a quarterback, is much more than just a player in the game—they’re the key to making sure everyone gets out safely.

Learn More

 

Warrick headshotChris Warrick, NRP, is a Nationally Registered Paramedic, Confined Space Rescue Technician, and EMS educator who serves as Medical Program Manager at Roco Rescue. Most recently, he has taken on the added responsibility of Marketing Coordinator. Chris is an avid photographer and videographer, who spends lots of time at the Roco Training Center – where all of the action is. He also writes and publishes blogs on our website, RocoRescue.com. Between the two major responsibilities, Chris keeps very busy and enjoys his work.

Tragedies from the OSHA Incident Log

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

The following fatality reports were summarized from recent OSHA News Releases (osha.gov).

CONFINED SPACE FATALITIES


Welder Fatality in Confined Space

PALATKA, FL – As he had many other days, the morning shift welder arrived to work at 5 a.m. on Aug. 28, 2023. Tasked with doing some fabrication work in a 4-foot by 8-foot space in a ship’s hull, the employee began work unaware that fatal suffocation would soon end his life.

Less than two hours after entering the ship, a supervisor found the unconscious welder and signaled for help, only to fall unconscious as well. A third employee appeared, alerting EMS and the Palatka Fire Department, who soon transported all three workers to a nearby hospital. Despite emergency treatment, the welder died from a lack of oxygen. The supervisor and the third worker received medical treatment and were released.

OSHA inspectors determined that the shipbuilder exposed workers to oxygen deficiency by sending the welder into a confined space without first testing the air for oxygen content. The presence of welding gas in the space created an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.

"Following proper maritime industry protocols could have prevented this worker from losing his life," explained OSHA Area Office Director Scott Tisdale. "The ship building company must perform hazard assessments and implement safety procedures to ensure a tragedy like this does not recur. Every employer should make health and safety a core value in their workplaces."


"Following proper maritime industry protocols could have prevented this worker from losing his life"


The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports more than 1,030 U.S. workers died from 2011 to 2018 from workplace injuries related to confined spaces.

 

Fatality in Houston Tank Cleaning Incident

HOUSTON, TX – A La Porte tank cleaning company again chose to disregard federal safety standards that may have protected their employees from hazardous working conditions and prevented another employee from suffering a fatal injury. Just two days before Christmas, the wife and son of an employee at the company grew concerned when he didn't return after his shift. Later that day, he was found unresponsive.

A workplace safety investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration determined that the employer of the fallen worker had failed to ensure that atmospheric testing was done inside the tank before allowing the 53-year-old employee to enter it.

Even more tragically, the same company had been cited for the same violations four years earlier after two workers succumbed while cleaning inside a tanker truck.

"Had the company acted responsibly and made the safety reforms as required in 2020, another employee would not have lost their life," explained OSHA Area Director Larissa Ipsen in Houston.

In addition to identifying the company's failure to conduct required testing, OSHA cited the company for seven serious violations, including the following:

  • Failing to implement measures to prevent unauthorized entry into a permit-required confined space.
  • Not providing an attendant while employees entered permit-required confined spaces.
  • Numerous failures related to the confined space entry permit, including:
  • Not identifying the authorized duration of entry.
  • Which rescue and emergency services are to be summoned?
  • How to summon emergency services.
  • Failing to specify personal protective, rescue, and communications equipment and alarm systems.
  • Overexposing employees to carbon monoxide.
  • Not protecting conductors that entered an electrical panel box from abrasions and leaving an electrical outlet without a cover plate.

"This employer's complete disregard for its employees' safety is unacceptable. Complying with safety and health standards is not optional,” added Ipsen.

 

TRENCH INCIDENT


Fatal Trench Cave-In Investigation

BRIDGEPORT, CT – A concrete and earthwork contractor could have prevented an employee repairing an underground water line from suffering fatal injuries in a trench collapse at a work site but failed to follow federal safety standards for excavations.

Five employees were exposed to cave-in, engulfment, or struck-by hazards when the employer did not do the following:

  • Provide cave-in protection for the more than 12-foot-deep vertical walled trench, which resulted in the death of an employee.
  • Train employees on how to recognize and avoid trenching hazards.
  • Ensure an excavator is kept more than two feet from the trench's edge.
  • Verify the location of underground utilities and/or structures prior to excavation.

"Despite prior warnings, the company ignored trench safety protections, and that decision cost an employee their life," said OSHA Area Director Catherine Brescia in Bridgeport, Connecticut. "All employers should make workplace safety a priority or risk being responsible for leaving the family, friends, and co-workers of one or more of their employees to grieve this kind of preventable death."


"Despite prior warnings, the company ignored trench safety protections, and that decision cost an employee their life"


 

FATAL FALLS


29-story Fall Fatality from Damaged Fall Pro & Rope Equipment

Employer’s failure to inspect and replace damaged fall protection equipment leads to a 29-story fatal fall…

BRAINTREE, MA – The U.S. Department of Labor has determined a window cleaning company's failure to inspect and replace damaged or defective equipment contributed to an employee's fatal 29-story fall from a building in downtown Boston's financial district in October 2023.

The department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration found that the employer willfully exposed employees to fall hazards by not ensuring personal fall protection systems and a rope descent system workers used were in proper working condition at the work site. Specifically, OSHA investigators learned the company had not inspected the rope and equipment adequately for damage and other deterioration and did not remove defective components from service before each work shift and replace them.

OSHA's investigation determined that the employer:

  • Failed to adequately train employees on how to inspect ropes for maximum allowable wear, to recognize defects and conditions that warrant removal from service, and on proper use of the rope descent system. The ropes used in the rope descent systems were not effectively padded or otherwise protected to prevent them from being cut or weakened.
  • Allowed the use of rope descent system ropes, lifelines, and lanyards for personal fall protection that were not compatible with connectors and unprotected from damage such as cuts and erosion.
  • Failed to use only certified building anchorage for the rope descent system.
  • OSHA cited the company for two willful, four serious, and two repeat violations and assessed $447,087 in proposed penalties, an amount set by federal statute.

"To ensure the safety of employees who work at heights, employers must make their responsibility to provide comprehensive training on inspecting rope descent systems and fall protection equipment and components before each use an absolute priority," said OSHA Regional Administrator Galen Blanton in Boston. "The U.S. Department of Labor will continue to hold employers accountable when they fail to take the necessary steps to protect their workers."


"To ensure the safety of employees who work at heights, employers must make their responsibility to provide comprehensive training on inspecting rope descent systems and fall protection equipment and components before each use an absolute priority,"


 

A Construction Worker Falls 23 Feet After Employer Neglects Equipment and Training

The worker’s fatal fall was preventable if the contractor had provided employees with fall protection equipment, training…

SYRACUSE, NY – A construction contractor could have prevented an employee’s fatal fall at a New York job site by providing adequate fall protection and training employees in its effective use, a U.S. Department of Labor investigation found.

OSHA Inspectors found that the contractor failed to provide the worker who was fatally injured and three other employees with effective fall protection, exposing them to falls of 23 feet as they replaced an aluminum standing seam roof on a building.

OSHA also determined that the company neglected to ensure that its employees were trained on fall hazards, in the use of personal fall arrest systems, and on the correct procedures for installing, maintaining, and inspecting the fall protection systems on site.

In addition, the employer designed, installed, and used fall protection systems at the worksite without the supervision of a qualified person, which was in violation of OSHA requirements. The limited fall protection systems in place were neither installed nor used correctly.

“Falls are the leading cause of construction industry deaths, and yet this company chose to ignore federal standards and exposed four employees — including the deceased — to this deadly hazard,” said OSHA Area Director Jeffrey Prebish in Syracuse, New York. “This led OSHA to cite and fine the company for the lack of fall protection on an instance-by-instance basis – one citation for each of the four exposed workers.”

“As is often the case in workplace falls from elevations, this tragedy could have been prevented had the contractor followed and maintained basic, commonsense, and legally required safeguards. Employers must commit to providing and using effective fall protection systems and equipment and training workers in their use,” added Prebish.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 395 people died in workplace falls from elevation in 2022.

 

54-year-old Dies After Falling Through Unprotected Skylight

The employer allowed employees to work 19 feet high without protective harnesses…

ATLANTA – A five-man crew's first day working to remove tar and stone from metal roof panels at a Macon warehouse ended abruptly when a 54-year-old laborer tragically suffered fatal injuries after stepping on a skylight and falling about 19 feet.

A U.S. Department of Labor investigation found Georgia construction contractor could have prevented the incident by providing their employees with required fall protection.

An ambulance rushed the worker, who suffered severe injuries, to a nearby hospital, where they succumbed to their injuries hours later. In addition, the company failed to notify OSHA of the incident within the required 8 hours.

OSHA's inspection found the company failed to protect its employees by not using fall protection systems and leaving skylights without safety guardrails on the roof on the day of the fatal incident. Despite this tragic incident, agency inspectors once again found that the company allowed employees to work without these life-saving measures 2 months after OSHA was notified of the violations.

"After more than 20 years of experience as a roofing and framing contractor, the company should know the work its employees do is dangerous and potentially fatal, especially when safety protocols are ignored," said OSHA Area Director Joshua Turner. "Falls are widely known as the leading cause of death in the construction industry and had required fall protections been in place in this case, a worker's family, friends and co-workers would not be left now to grieve a terrible loss."


"Falls are widely known as the leading cause of death in the construction industry and had required fall protections been in place in this case, a worker's family, friends and co-workers would not be left now to grieve a terrible loss."


 

A Tribute to My Forever Boss...

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Fire Chief C.A. “Pete” Shelton

(1932-2024)

CA Shelton

by Kay L. Goodwyn, President/CEO 

I was 20 years old when I walked into the Beaumont (TX) Central Fire Station to interview for an administrative job. I had actually applied with the City of Beaumont – and it just so happened the available opening was for Fire Chief C. A. Shelton and the Beaumont Fire Department. Fortunately, I was selected for the job, and as they say, “The rest is history.” 

Soon, Chief Shelton became my forever boss and lifelong mentor. He was everything you think of in a Fire Chief – he was a big man with a very commanding presence. And, when it came to the fire department and his beloved City of Beaumont, he was very serious and all business. He was tough, no doubt about it. And he wanted things (every-thing!) done right; and, of course, done immediately. He set the standards high for himself and everybody else within the department he loved so deeply.  

Chief was also very hands-on and involved in every aspect of the department – nothing missed his careful inspection. I saw how stressful his job was as the leader of a 240+ person department. And he lived it 24 hours a day. I watched him make many tough calls from that big desk as well as from the fire ground during a major emergency. But he always wanted to do the right thing in the right way, no matter what the task. 

During my first couple of years at the BFD, I fell in love with the fire service. I wanted to know everything about it – and Chief expected me to as well. My dad had been in the U.S. Forest Service, so I remembered when he had to occasionally go out to fires in the Piney Woods of Deep East Texas – and I especially remember the Smokey Bear coloring books he brought home! There has been a long appreciation in my life for emergency responders. 

Chief Shelton gave me every opportunity to work with the various divisions within the department – and I loved it all.! A few years into my employment, Chief knew I wanted to do more… Yes, I wanted to try out for the Fire Academy. While he was not crazy about idea, he supported me and encouraged me along the way. I studied for the Civil Service exam while preparing for the dreaded physical agility test seven days a week. I had never worked so hard. I came in second on the written exam and completed all of the agility test except the darn pull ups – and you were allowed to miss two of the segments and still pass the test. So, with advice from a local female police officer, I learned how to scale a six-foot wall – it just took a special technique and lots of bruises.  

Because I had worked with most of the firefighters and staff at the fire department for several years, I had the support of most of them. In fact, some of the older guys would volunteer to work with me in learning how to drive the older fire trucks that were out at the Training Center. So many people helped me – and I will never forget them. 

Then, in the freezing cold of January 1976, Chief Shelton welcomed me to the Beaumont Fire Academy. It was at the BFD Training Center where I attended with 25 other rookies from surrounding fire departments (Beaumont, Port Arthur, Nederland, etc.). I didn’t know any of them, so it was quite interesting, and I definitely have many, many stories to tell. Three months later most of the group graduated from the academy as the best of friends. But, no doubt, those guys nearly drove me crazy – and we were together seven days a week! 

For eight years, I enjoyed my time at the BFD and working for Chief Shelton – he afforded me so many opportunities to learn and grow. He and others taught me about writing detailed specifications for purchasing everything from 5-inch fire hose to 100-ft. aerial trucks. And, yes, getting a new fire truck was a big day, for sure. I think the most trucks we had delivered at one time was three, but it was quite a task getting them outfitted right down to the “gold leaf” numbering on the doors. Chief was strict to uphold the traditions of the fire service while always progressing, always advancing and being the best at everything we did. 

Chief was instrumental in making the BFD and its Fire Training Center one of the best in the country. He was relentless when it came to budget time – and he never thought about backing down – whether it was facing the city manager or the mayor! Again, he made sure we were always growing and progressing.  

During the years, we conducted numerous regional fire academies at our Training Center and there was also a large fire school each year with hundreds of people – Chief was in his glory! And he never failed to help outfit a small volunteer group if they were short on their gear. He really loved helping people – especially those that loved the fire service like he did. 

Chief Shelton was so good to me; however, we did butt heads over one major topic…Angel, the dalmatian fire dog. I had always been an animal nut and insisted Angel have the best in medical care and accommodations. Chief did not share my animal craziness, so it really put him to the test at times. Then Angel got so fond of me that she would not leave my side – from leaping into the jump-seat on the engine with me when we made a run to strutting into the Chief’s office completely unannounced. In fact, she would scratch the paint from Chief’s office door if I happened to go in there without her. Angel, ironic name, was always getting into trouble. Because we worked at the downtown fire station, there were numerous people walking by on their way to lunch. More than once, Angel stole a brown lunch bag right out of a stranger’s hands. She was reported to the Fire Chief multiple times – and more complaints came in weekly about MY dog! 

When I left the BFD to move to Baton Rouge, it was a very sad day. But Chief was understanding and wished me all the best. My next challenge was just ahead – I had never owned or operated a business, although I was excited about the new little company called Roco Rescue. For the next 40 years, Chief Shelton and I remained in contact. He has always been a guiding force in my life. I remain committed to his goals of excellence and being the best possible. I truly believe his mentorship has had much to do with the success I’ve enjoyed in business and in life. He will never be forgotten. Here’s to you, Chief. 

https://broussards1889.com/obituary/c-a-pete-shelton/ 

Challenging Recovery Operation for Responders

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Jackson Recovery 1Jackson, Mississippi is a burgeoning metro area with over 600,000 residents. Interstate highways busily crisscross the city. In the early evening of April 30, 2024, emergency responders found themselves planning how to recover the body of a man that had been missing for a month.

An angler had discovered the body and called 911. Local law enforcement confirmed the location of the body and the Hinds County Department of Emergency Management called for resources. Raymond Fire Protection District answered the call. As the Technical Rescue arm of the multi-agency response and also knowing that the area was filled with levees and flood control zones, Raymond firefighters geared up with ropes and a SKED stretcher system.

On scene personnel had originally determined that boat access would be the best approach, but the location of the body along the 40’ rocky slope quickly changed to a ground-based recovery.

Raymond firefighters and other responders moved through three quarters of a mile of brush, loose scree, and at times, knee deep sand to arrive on the levee above the body. With darkness now upon them, the eight technical rescuers began planning the recovery operation.

Because they were in the middle of the often-flooded levee, rescuers moved forty yards to the west of the Pearl River to an elevated billboard advertising to the thousands of cars passing by every day on Interstate 20. An anchor was established and extended over 100-feet to the top of the levee.

Jackson Recovery 2Three rescuers scrambled down the slope to assist local law enforcement. The victim was placed in a body bag and securely packed in the SKED stretcher. Meanwhile, topside rescuers used the extended anchor to establish a haul system using a Petzl Maestro and a newly acquired CMC Capto in a 3:1 Z-Rig configuration.

Four litter attendants lifted the man, and the haul began. Heavy brush and knee-deep sand proved challenging, but the team soon reached the top of the levee. While rescuers were coming up the slope, personnel from Hind County EMS, Jackson Fire Department and local law enforcement had made access to the area traveling in a side-by-side. The victim was loaded and driven to the roadway to be transferred to the coroner. All told, emergency responders spent nearly four hours moving the body.

Jackson Recovery 3So often, the outcome of our rescue response is predetermined. Our actions provide closure rather than the excitement of a rescue. However, we can take solace in knowing that the professionalism and preparedness of local responders gave a local family the opportunity to say goodbye.

Roco Rescue is honored to recognize Raymond Fire Department, Hinds County Department of Emergency Management and other Jackson, Mississippi, responders that espouse the definition of quiet professional.

Atmospheric Monitoring Testing Frequency

Thursday, June 27, 2024

entrant-monitoring

In confined space work, ensuring air quality is a top priority. With directives from OSHA and consensus recommendations from ANSI & NFPA, understanding the ins and outs of atmospheric monitoring is key. This article will briefly review what OSHA requires as well as what ANSI, NFPA and Roco recommend for practices that ensure worker safety remains the top priority in working in these challenging environments. While the OSHA General Industry standard allows for periodic monitoring and sets no exact timespan between testing – however, as a safer way, Roco recommends continuous air monitoring any time workers are in the space.

OSAH Compliance Corner White NewOSHA 1910.146 refers to testing the internal atmosphere before an employee enters the space and testing as necessary to maintain acceptable entry conditions. Testing should be based on the hazard assessment for a given space as well as how rapidly those hazards could cause a change in the atmosphere, which may require additional action for safe entry.

OSHA’s Confined Spaces in Construction (1926-Subpart AA) also references monitoring frequency. It states continuous monitoring is required unless periodic monitoring is sufficient to ensure entry conditions are maintained, or continuous monitoring is not commercially available.

Note: Also take into consideration any previous work activities that may have introduced atmospheric hazards into the space as well as any known history of hazardous atmospheric conditions.


"Roco strongly encourages continuous monitoring while workers are inside a permit-required confined space."


Looking at best practice consensus standards, ANSI Z117 advocates for continuous monitoring in situations when a worker is present in a space where atmospheric conditions have the potential to change. confined-space-gas-tester

The national consensus standard, NFPA 350 Guide for Safe Confined Space Entry and Work 2022, also generally refers to “continuous air monitoring” when possible. Here’s a quote from NFPA 350, Section 7.13.1 (www.nfpa.org), Continuous Atmospheric Monitoring, “Atmospheric conditions can change quickly or gradually over time; without continuous atmospheric monitoring, air contaminants may increase, or the oxygen percentage may decrease or increase, creating dangerous confined space atmospheric conditions.” NFPA adds, “Entrants, Attendants, and other personnel may be unaware of changing conditions if the air quality was only initially monitored and determined to be acceptable. The atmosphere within and outside the confined space should be monitored continuously to ensure continued safe working conditions.”

PRE-ENTRY TESTING

Although OSHA does not define a specific timeline to conduct pre-entry monitoring, Roco uses as a guideline that a “baseline test” is to be conducted approximately 30 minutes prior to the entry and then again immediately prior to entry. If ventilation is being used as a control measure for atmospheric hazards, initial atmospheric monitoring should be conducted without ventilation to establish a baseline atmosphere.

A comparison of these readings could indicate that atmospheric changes have occurred inside the space. If a space has been vacated for a period of time, it is recommended that similar baseline testing be repeated. This is critical as it may reveal the presence of previously unrecognized or unanticipated atmospheric hazards.

Again, confined space work is inherently hazardous – and atmospheric hazards are a leading cause of fatalities. Do everything you can to keep your people safe. Don’t let your guard down even for a minute!


Additional Resources: 

Frequently Asked Questions: OSHA PRCS Standard Clarification 

How much periodic testing is required?

The frequency of testing depends on the nature of the permit space and the results of the initial testing performed under paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(c). The requirement in paragraph (c)(5)(ii)(F) for periodic testing as necessary to ensure the space is maintained within the limits of the acceptable entry conditions is critical. OSHA believes that all permit space atmospheres are dynamic due to variables such as temperature, pressure, physical characteristics of the material posing the atmospheric hazard, variable efficiency of ventilation equipment and air delivery system, etc. The employer will have to determine and document on an individual permit space basis what the frequency of testing will be and under what conditions the verification testing will be done.
 
What does testing or monitoring "as necessary" mean as required by 1910.146(d)(5)(ii) to decide if the acceptable entry conditions are being maintained?

The standard does not have specific frequency rates because of the performance-oriented nature of the standard and the unique hazards of each permit space. However, there will always be, to some degree, testing or monitoring during entry operations which is reflective of the atmospheric hazard.

Some of the factors that affect frequency are:

* Results of test allowing entry.
* The regularity of entry (daily, weekly, or monthly).
* The uniformity of the permit space (the extent to which the configuration, use, and contents vary).
* The documented history of previous monitoring activities.
* Knowledge of the hazards which affect the permit space as well as the historical experience gained from monitoring results of previous entries.

Knowledge and recorded data gained from successive entries (such as ventilation required to maintain acceptable entry conditions) may be used to document changes in the frequency of monitoring.

Learn More

RescueTalk™ (RocoRescue.com) has been created as a free resource for sharing insightful information, news, views and commentary for our students and others who are interested in technical rope rescue. Therefore, we make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any information and are not liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. Users and readers are 100% responsible for their own actions in every situation. Information presented on this website in no way replaces proper training!